AGPA Connect Program Proposal Submission System
Connect 2024, National Harbor, MD
February 26 - March 2

 
 
You are currently in test mode
FORMAT DEFINITIONS AND PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AGPA CONNECT 2024
 
TWO-DAY INSTITUTE
 
GENERAL PROCESS GROUPS: These sections, which are structured to provide experiential and cognitive learning, examine analytic and process group experience. Individuals applying to lead general process group sections must be Certified Group Psychotherapists (CGPs) and have previously attended the National Instructor-Designate Section.
 
To submit a General Process Group proposal you will need to prepare:
      • Faculty Participation at previous AGPA annual events
      • List past experiences relevant to the topic area
      • Explain your qualification to teach the specific content
      • Explain how you'll address and/or incorporate diversity related issues
      • Describe your own personal and professional journey to better understanding of diversity issues

        (scroll down for more detail)
 
SPECIFIC FOCUS PROCESS GROUPS: Intensive learning exploring a variety of theories and methods in group treatment are offered in these limited registration groups. Current topics may be pursued in greater depth and instructors may offer new approaches and methods into private practice, clinic and agency work. NOTE: These groups are usually led by one instructor and meet over two days; occasionally two instructors may lead a group. Individuals applying to lead Specific Focus Process Group sections must be Certified Group Psychotherapists (CGPs).
 
To submit a Specific Focus Process Group proposal you will need to prepare:
      • Faculty Participation at previous AGPA annual events
      • List past experiences relevant to the topic area
      • Explain your qualification to teach the specific content
      • Explain how you'll address and/or incorporate diversity related issues
      • Describe your own personal and professional journey to better understanding of diversity issues
      • First-time instructors for Specific Focus Process Groups who have not previously led an AGPA Institute must submit two letters of reference from AGPA members or individuals familiar with their work recommending a faculty appointment to the Institute.
      • Session title
      • Session description
      • Learning objectives
      • Program outline tied to the learning objectives
      • Ten assessment questions
      • Statement of evidence-based approach
      • Significant articles
      • Co-presenter profile information (if applicable)

        (scroll down for more detail)
 
THREE-DAY CONFERENCE
 
OPEN SESSIONS: These sections are 2½-hour, 90-minute or 1-hour presentations and have unlimited attendance. Various formats may be used; most usually require a designated chair and several presenters. Some topics lend themselves to formal presentations followed by a designated discussant. Others are best handled through a less structured format. Active discussion with the audience is encouraged in all Open Sessions.
 
First-time faculty for Open Session are typically limited to 90-minute or one-hour presentations.
 
All open session proposals accepted for presentation at AGPA Connect will be audio recorded. Chairpersons and panelists agree to have their remarks recorded by virtue of accepting an invitation to present at AGPA Connect. The following formats may be used:


PANELS: Panelists present formal papers and/or address questions posed by the chairperson in a particular area of interest. 

DEMONSTRATION GROUPSFaculty demonstrate approaches on specific topics, in some cases utilizing groups composed of volunteers from the audience. Open Session panel or demonstration group proposals should be submitted as a complete package with all participants confirmed. The responsibility for this resides with the chairperson who is expected to work with all participants in advance to assure a high quality session. The proposal should indicate the suggested duration of the presentation. Events may be linked with other presentations on a similar topic.


COURSES: These events are held for 10 hours held over two or three days or 5 hours for one day and have unlimited attendance. Various formats may be used, however, a clearly structured curriculum is always in place and submitted for review with the proposal to the Committee. Submit the curriculum outline with the proposal.
 
WORKSHOPS: These events are 5-hour (all-day), 2½-hour (half-day) or 90-minute meetings where participants exchange information among themselves and with the chairperson. Attendance is limited, with interaction guided by the faculty person.
 
To submit an Open Session, Course or a Workshop proposal you will need to prepare:

      • Faculty Participation at previous AGPA annual events
      • List past experiences relevant to the topic area
      • Explain your qualification to teach the specific content
      • Explain how you'll address and/or incorporate diversity related issues
      • Describe your own personal and professional journey to better understanding of diversity issues
      • First-time faculty for Open Session or a Workshop must also submit a letter of reference from a AGPA member or someone who can directly address the leader's ability to conduct the session.
      • Session title
      • Session description
      • Learning objectives
      • Program outline tied to the learning objectives
      • Ten assessment questions
      • Statement of evidence-based approach
      • Significant articles
      • Co-presenter profile information (if applicable)

        (scroll down for more detail)

 
*** IMPORTANT: Faculty participation is limited to two events. The following restrictions also apply: Participants will not be invited to participate in two limited registration events (e.g., Institute and Workshop) nor will you be invited to participate in two unlimited registration events (e.g., two Open Sessions).
 
*** NOTE: The Committee reserves the right to recommend and propose a different format for the submitted event (for example, even if you submit a workshop, the Committee may recommend an alternative format which may restrict participation as noted above).
 

 
 
More Detail
 
Presenter Experience
Past experiences relevant to topic area (most recent first): Please do not say "see attached" or refer to other documents.
 
Back to top

 

Presenter QualificationHow is this presenter qualified (by education and/or experience) to teach assigned content? (Expertise in a topic does not equate ability to teach the material. Please explain your qualifications to teach the material.) Do not say "see above", as this question has a different focus.
 
Back to top

 

Session DescriptionA 50-80 word or less, paragraph form synopsis of the content of your presentation
 
Back to top

 

DiversityDiversity issues are integral to all the work we do as group psychotherapists. A culturally-responsive approach to group therapy respects peoples’ complex identities. Please explain how your session addresses and/or incorporates issues related to social justice, anti-oppressive practices, and/or diversity (e.g., differing ages, races, sexual orientations, religions, gender identities, cultures, body size, abilities or socio-economic realities)?
 
Back to top

 

My JourneyPlease share your personal and professional journey in developing cultural-humility. Include your approach to incorporating accessibility, anti-racism, cultural inclusivity, and/or anti-oppression values in your group work.
 
Back to top

 

Learning Objectives

 Learning objectives guidelines:

1-3 hour long sessions: 3 objectives (required minimum)
4-6 hour long sessions: 4-5 objectives
7-8 hour long sessions: 5-6 objectives
8+ hour long sessions: 10 objectives

Objectives are:

  • Something the learner will be able to do…
  • After the session is over…
  • That is observable or audible
  • And that is measurable while still in the learning situation.

To write good objectives, start each with a verb from this list: analyze, apply, appraise, choose, cite, classify, compare, conduct, contrast, create, define, demonstrate, describe, design, detect, differentiate, discuss, distinguish, evaluate, explain, identify, interpret, list, match, measure, name, plan, predict, prepare, prescribe, propose, rank, rate, review, revise, select, specify, state, summarize, utilize.

Do NOT start objectives with any of the following: understand, know, learn, appreciate, recognize, acquire.

Examples of good objectives:

  • State the simple rules for emotional congruence.
  • Compare options for improving the client's termination process.
  • Identify the principle methods of avoidance and the effect on the connection between the therapist and patient.
  • List methods of facilitating dialogue with individual patients

In each of the above cases, the learner is the one doing the “action”, it can be observed (seen or heard) and it is happening during the learning situation

Back to top 

 

Program Outline
Submit a full outline of the material to be covered by the program offering. DO NOT submit a paragraph or prose description of your course in place of an outline. Please write your agenda to meet the following formatting requirements (if submitted agenda does not meet these formats, you will be asked to revise it):
  • Do not allocate large amounts of time to introduction of speakers.
  • Highlight only major topics and subtopics.
  • For each topic:
    • Indicate the number of the learning objective that is being addressed in that topic/content.
    • Indicate which presenter will be teaching that topic (if there is more than one presenter).
    • Indicate the teaching method(s) used to deliver the content of that topic (e.g., lecture, PowerPoint, video, handouts, discussion, Q&A, role play, demonstration, small group activity, case study, etc.).
    • Indicate the number of minutes allocated to each topic:
      NOTE: When indicating the number of minutes, do not use large block of minutes, (e.g., 180 minutes). Large periods of time must be broken down in smaller fragments. Even if your session includes a topic or event (such as a group process) that covers several hours, you must outline what you expect to happen during that time and indicate the number of minutes allocated to each part.

DO NOT list or indicate any time for breaks or lunch - list only time spent for educational content. AGPA will include time for breaks and lunch when submitting the information to the CE Boards.

If your presentation covers more than one day, please indicate Day 1, Day 2, etc.

Timing for presentations:

  • Two-Day Institute: Day 1 = 360 minutes; Day 2 = 390 minutes
  • All-Day Workshop = 300 minutes
  • Half-Day Workshop/Open Session = 150 minutes

Example: (for a 60-minute presentation with two presenters)

  1. Fight-or-flight responses and couples distancing (25 min, Obj 1, John Smith, Lecture)
      • The phenomenon of flooding
      • Lowering intensity and increasing safety
      • Related research on effective and ineffective couples interventions
  2. Educating the couple (a case study) (10 min, Obj 1, Jane Doe, Case Study/Q&A)
      • content vs. process
      • mechanics of communications
      • treatment planning
  3. Assessment concerns related to this method (10 min, Obj 2, Smith/Doe, PwrPnt/Lecture/Discussion)
      • Organizing presenting problems
      • Using family history
      • Organizing current stressors
  4. Specific challenges to this model (10 min, Obj 3, Smith, PwrPnt/Lecture/Q&A)
      • Mentally ill partners
      • The silent couple
  5. Participant Evaluations (5 min)

Back to top

 
Assessment QuestionsAn assessment test consisting of ten objective questions with no more than one true/false question format. The questions must pertain to information the attendee has learned as a result of attending the program offering. Please keep the questions objective and close-ended and provide the correct answers to the questions as well.
 
 

APA requirementsAPA requirements state that CE programs must be grounded in an evidence-based approach. CE programs that are focused on application of psychological assessment and/or intervention methods must include content that is credibly supported by the most current scientific evidence. CE programs may also provide information related to ethical, legal, statutory or regulatory policies, guidelines, and standards that impact psychology. Write a brief narrative describing the accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the empirical basis of the content, the limitations of the content, and the severe and the most common risks.
 
 
 
Significant Articles
As evidence that program content meets the requirements of APA educational standards, provide at least three (3) current (within the past 10 years), relevant (aligned with learning objectives and content), supporting (e.g., peer-review journal articles), and complete references in APA format.
 
Do not provide more than one reference authored by yourself or your co-presenting team, as the references are to both show broad support for the professional acceptance of the content and to provide learners with additional sources for reading beyond what the presenters themselves have written as well as contradictory evidence and its source.

These references will be published in the online syllabus. Include complete article references utilizing the style outlined in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th edition); you may also use the International Journal of Group Psychotherapy as a guide -- copies of the articles are not necessary. For books, include city and publisher; for articles include journal, volume, number of issue and pages. Sample references are also included below for your convenience.

Journal articles:

Chang-Caffaro, S., & Caffaro, J. (2018). Differences that make a difference: Diversity and the process group leader. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 68(4), 483–497.

Paquin, J. D., Abegunde, C., Hahn, A., & Fassinger, R. E. (2021). A brief history of group therapy as a field and the representation of women in its development. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 71(1), 13-80. https:/ / doi.org/ 10.1080/00207284.2020.1798176


Books:

Grossmark, R. (2018). The unobtrusive relational analyst: Explorations in psychoanalytic companioning. Routledge.

Kaklauskas, F. J., & Greene, L. R. (Eds.). (2020). Core principles of group psychotherapy: An integrated theory, research, and practice training manual. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429260803